Behind closed doors and countless documents, details
of a proposed deal between two of the world’s largest economies are
being kept from us. Until now.
Chances are that the planned trade deal between the
European Union and Japan has not been on top of your mind recently. And
there is a reason for this. Governments have gone to great lengths to
leave their citizens in the dark about a deal that can significantly
impact our lives and the world we live in—with massive implications reaching from labour rights to environmental protection.
This is unacceptable. Which is why today Greenpeace Netherlands is releasing large parts of the secret EU-Japan deal.
Transparent public reading room for leaked TTIP documents, Berlin, 2 May, 2016
JEFTA, as it is commonly referred to, will ultimately
affect the daily lives of more than 630 million European and Japanese
citizens who until today’s leak have not been informed by their governments as to what exactly is being negotiated on their behalf.
Global trade has significant ramifications for
environmental protection and climate change. How many, and what kind of
products are traded and often shipped over long distances impacts our
planet, as do the health, safety and environmental standards for these
products. Which is why the rules governing such trade matter a great
deal.
Uncovering what lies beneath JEFTA
The documents Greenpeace Netherlands released today
show that JEFTA will mainly benefit large corporations at the expense of
people and the planet. The agreement could make it harder for the EU
and Japan to take the environmental measures necessary to reach their
Paris Agreement obligations. For instance, the agreement will likely
undermine efforts to reduce illegal logging around the world, including
in Europe. With hardly any tangible or concrete commitments on
environmental protection, JEFTA opens the door for corporate lobbyists
to attack Europe’s environmental standards.
Greenpeace volunteers in Romania call on the government to protect the forest. 15 Aug, 2016
Over three million Europeans
signed a petition calling for the end of special rights for foreign
corporations, but prioritising investor protection is nevertheless part
of JEFTA. Rather than having to make their case before domestic courts
(like every one of us), the deal would grant foreign investors and
corporations the possibility to use a separate court system. This would
enable them to sue the state over environmental (or other) regulations
that they don’t like. At the same time, the state or the public get no
special rights to sue the corporations for labour and environmental
violations. This undermines both democracy and the rule of law.
Activists
at the European conference centre in Luxembourg call on ministers to
reject CETA (Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement). 18 Oct, 2016
A threat to our rights
JEFTA is a threat to our democratic rights, our
health and environment. It is also a missed opportunity. The exchange of
goods and services — but also of ideas — can help open and
connect the world in a way that achieves social and environmental
objectives that keep us within our planetary boundaries. Environmental
treaties, human rights agreements, and international labour
standards — with principles of equality and intergenerational
responsibility at their heart — must guide trade rules, not be
threatened by them.
If negotiators want to demonstrate that this
agreement advances the public interest, they need to start by
voluntarily publishing all the texts, enshrining social and
environmental standards in the agreements. Above all they must not lose sight of the true end goal: trade as a means to achieve wellbeing for people and planet, not as an end in itself.
For more on Greenpeace’s vision for trade, read our Ten Principles For Trade. For access and further analysis of the EU-Japan deal, visit www.trade-leaks.org.
Shira Stanton is a Senior Political Strategist and Sebastian Bock is a Senior Business Strategist at Greenpeace International
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.