As 2020 is the year the Olympics and Paralympics come to Japan, this is an exciting time for sports and for the people of Japan. Amidst all the excitement however, there is the ongoing nuclear crisis in Fukushima prefecture. Labeled as the ‘Reconstruction Olympics’, Prime Minister Abe in 2013 declared that the situation at Fukushima Daiichi was under control. Seven years later there still remains a nuclear emergency at the nuclear plant and surrounding areas. In addition to the enormous challenges of how to safely manage over 1 million tonnes of contaminated water at the site and as much as 880 tonnes of molten nuclear fuel
for which there is no credible solution, there remain wider issues regarding radioactive contamination of the environment, its effect on workers and Fukushima citizens, including evacuees and their human rights.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/382e7/382e763a5f9962b03fb87a83f6dd8913fd17f209" alt=""
©︎ Shaun Burnie/Greenpeace
What does it mean to host the Olympics and Paralympics in the context of an ongoing nuclear disaster, the effects of which are still being felt by tens of thousands of Japanese citizens? What does it tell about the Japanese government and its commitment to respecting the values of transparency and the human rights of its citizens? These are some of the important questions raised by HBO and they warrant careful consideration in the months leading up to this year’s summer games.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9362d/9362d2c50a5f3ecab80261b7aa184d4311ba21c1" alt=""
©︎ Shaun Burnie/Greenpeace
The decision to host two sporting events in Fukushima city raises genuine and important questions over radiation risks. The route of the Olympic Torch relay in all the municipalities of Fukushima prefecture includes the districts of Iitate, Namie, and Okuma where Greenpeace Japan’s Nuclear Monitoring & Radiation Protection Team has discovered radioactive hotspots, both in the open areas as well as in the remaining radiation exclusion zones, that remain too high even by revised governmental standards. What does all this mean for the hosting of Olympic events, including for athletes and visitors?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dbb93/dbb93b2427e2f0bb2c383bc3156236e8229e071a" alt=""
©︎ Shaun Burnie/Greenpeace
Shaun Burnie is Senior Nuclear Specialist at Greenpeace Germany.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.